Sarah Palin


My previous posts in this series are

ON JOHN MCCAIN
In light of my argument that I’ve made on the evils of the Bush administration, my brothers and friends have reminded me repeatedly that our choice doesn’t include George W. Bush. Obama is running against John McCain, not Bush. I understand the point, but Bush and his administration does factor into this for one simple reason, which I will demonstrate by asking some questions. Which candidate in his demeanor, his campaign, his rhetoric and his voting can be trusted to wage the battle against the Bush Legacy? In other words, who is more likely to work vociferously to restore human and constitutional rights? Who is more likely to restore the Rule of Law? Who is more likely to pursue criminal and human rights charges against people in the highest levels of government? Who is more likely to show the rest of the world that America’s promise to be a beacon of justice and opportunity is not just a sham, but that America can live up to the IDEA of her greatest virtues. My Answer is - Not John McCain.

Before I tell you why, I would be remiss if I didn’t admit up front that there is much that I admire about John McCain. His record of service to our country as a Naval Aviator and the 5+ long years he spent as a POW must never be forgotten. Throughout much of his career, he really and truly has been a maverick, rejecting the ideology of his own party and reaching across the aisle in compromise. He has obtained some bitter enemies to his right over the years as a result, George W. Bush being one of them.

But something has happened to John McCain. I think he has wanted to be president for so long and with such determination that he literally made a conscious decision that he would do anything to win. He left his honor and his principles behind long ago. For example, in the last two years, he has voted with Bush 90% of the time in the Senate. There are many examples but to me there are two especially notable ones. First when he voted in February, 2006 to allow the CIA to use “Enhanced Interrogation” (i.e. TORTURE) techniques, some of which were used against HIM as a POW in Vietnam. A Boston Globe article said at the time

JOHN MCCAIN this week had a choice between his principles and propping up a failed president. He chose the latter.

The second obvious example is when McCain dropped support for his own immigration bill, that would’ve been a very good non-xenophobic compromise. But in the end he didn’t support his own bill because it was more important to appease the base than to stick to his principles. In a debate this February, he actually said that if his own bill had come to the floor, he would’ve voted against it. At the Carpetbagger Report (a liberal blog) a few days after that debate, Steve Benen wrote:

Over the last year or so, when John McCain was struggling to get his presidential campaign back on track, one of his more notable challenges was reinventing himself — again.

When he got to Congress, McCain was a rather conventional conservative Republican. After his role in the Keating Five scandal, McCain took on a reform-minded persona. By 1999, he was a self-described “maverick” and moderate, who would move the GOP to the center. By 2004, McCain was back to being a conservative again. By 2007, he had positioned himself as an establishment Republican, and when that didn’t work out, McCain decided he’d become some kind of hybrid of the various McCains of the recent past.

If I didn’t know better, I’d say McCain has very few core values, and is willing to shift with the wind to get ahead. It’s one of the reasons he’s flip-flopped all over the place throughout the campaign.

In addition to his more recent voting record, there are two more examples of McCain losing his principles and his honor for the sake of winning the election. The first one is how he has run his campaign. We’ve had a few arguments about this on this blog and in terms of who has run the less honorable campaign, with more smears, lies and distortions, I think McCain is the clear winner (although Obama’s campaign isn’t entirely without guilt). The really sad thing to me is that McCain used the exact same strategy (and even the same people and organizations) as was used against him in by the Bush campaign in 2000. I am just very glad that this time around this evil campaign tactics and smears have not worked against Barack Obama. I hope they analyze this thoroughly and that the experts conclude that that kind of campaigning doesn’t work anymore in this age of abundant information. I’m hoping.

The last reason I believe that McCain the maverick, McCain the reformer, McCain the centrist is actually gone, never to return, is because of his pick of Sarah Palin as his running mate. If he loses tomorrow, historians will look back and consider this to be one of the greatest campaign blunders of all time. There are two reasons. First, by selecting Palin, he made it clear he was making an appeal to the extreme evangelical right-wing of the party’s base, thereby destroying his credibility as a centrist. Second, by picking someone with so little knowledge and experience, he removed the most powerful argument he had against Barack Obama, which was his experience. His selection of Palin has pretty much sealed the deal for me.

ON SARAH PALIN

First I want to emphasize something very important. As we have discussed abortion on this blog, I have made the (admittedly cynical) case that the republican party is really disingenuous when it comes to abortion, that every four years they wave the pro-life flags, get the pro-life believers motivated and fired up and then don’t actually do much to end abortion after the election. I think there is a strong case to be made for that point, but I think the best example against it in this election is Sarah Palin. I think Sarah Palin is genuinely pro-life and has put her money where her mouth is. I love seeing Trig Palin at rallies and I don’t doubt one iota, Sarah Palin’s commitment to the cause. My own son, who has Down Syndrome and is named Brig, gets to vote in his first election tomorrow and we have had to work hard to explain to him that he won’t be able to vote for Barack Obama AND Sarah Palin. I am not sure how he will vote. When we talk to him about the election we have tried to be neutral, but on the other hand he does hear us every day speak admiringly of Obama, so who knows? Only Brig does.

That being admitted, let me just say that I can’t stand Sarah Palin. I think she represents all the worst things about the republican party. I’m talking about the christian evangelical, divisive, right-wing, xenophobic, liberty-hating, religiously intolerant, Culture warring, flag-waving, ignorant, unthinking, partisan part of the party. She fires up that group more than any other politician since Pat Buchanan. That group really makes me mad and I believe represents the biggest threat to our country in existence today.

The fact that Sarah Palin is one 72 year old heartbeat away from the presidency scares the crap out of me. Remember how I said that we must fix the colossal errors of the Bush Administration and many of you have pointed out that Bush isn’t running this election. My answer is yes he is, and his name is Sarah Palin. I think she is like Dick Cheney with lipstick, only way more ignorant, more partisan and more ideological than Bush. Not only do I not think she herself has the intellect to actually lead our country well, I think she will just be a tool of the worst kind of people in the Republican Party. She would surround herself with extremists, (her track record in Alaska bears this out) and then she would become their tool. Like the emporor in Japan before and during the second World War. Much like I believe Bush has been a tool of Dick Cheney. Now lets suppose that, for some reason (maybe the abortion issue), my brothers actually convinced me not to vote for Obama. I can tell you right now, I would do like a favorite blogger, Molly and vote third party before I would risk putting Sarah Palin a heartbeat away from the Oval Office. If McCain wins this election, I will pray four hours a day for God to maintain his health and beg him to please keep Sarah Palin away from the White House.

Honestly, I may have hoped that John McCain would get into office and let his mavericky, centrist cream rise to the top of his ideological churn. Now the best I imagine is buttermilk, left in the garage, three weeks past the expiration date.

Scott

TPM documents (with a nifty interactive flash gadget) what many conservatives REALLY think of Sarah Palin.

LINK

This is rich. In an interview from earlier this year, she said:

A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist—Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine—that “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” Perhaps there is some meaningful distinction between spreading the wealth and sharing it (“collectively,” no less), but finding it would require the analytic skills of Karl the Marxist.

LINK

Scott

PALIN

Giving credit to a higher power for the day’s poll ratings, the Alaska governor told the roughly 500-person audience that things might be changing. “We even saw today, thank the Lord,” she said, looking upwards and raising her fist, “We saw some movement.”

I guess technically she is not stating that its god’s will for her and McCain to win, so its probably not out of bounds.
But what about this:

Palin also made a point of mentioning that she loved to visit the “pro-America” areas of the country, of which North Carolina is one. No word on which states she views as unpatriotic.

LINK

Scott

I think the conclusion of this article in Time Magazine about the Troopergate Branchflower report, that, although Palin broke no laws, her behavior and the behavior of her advisors revealed a remarkable “immaturity” and tendency towards abuse in the use of power:

The 263 pages of the report show a co-ordinated application of pressure on Monegan so transparent and ham-handed that it was almost certain to end in public embarrassment for the governor. The only surprise is that Troopergate is national news, not just a sorry piece of political gristle to be chewed on by Alaska politicos over steaks at Anchorage’s Club Paris.

A harsh verdict? Consider the report’s findings. Not only did people at almost every level of the Palin administration engage in repeated inappropriate contact with Walt Monegan and other high-ranking officials at the Department of Public Safety, but Monegan and his peers constantly warned these Palin disciples that the contact was inappropriate and probably unlawful. Still, the emails and calls continued — in at least one instance on recorded state trooper phone lines.

I’m flabbergasted.


Watch CBS Videos Online

Read The Dark Side
Read Angler
READ WaPO
READ The New Yorker

Guantanamo, Torture, warrantless wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, political manipulation of the justice department, manipulating science to change environmental policy, haliburton, secret energy meetings with oil company executives. The list goes on an on. I really think it would be justice for Dick Cheney to be impeached or even tried in a court of law.

Scott

Megan McCardle live blogged the VP debate and is frequently hilarious. A few choice quotes:

10:12 Joe Biden says, in re economic problems, “All you have to do is walk into Home Depot with me, where I spend a lot of time . . . “  Me Big Man!  Me Like Big Power tools!  Did I mention I have some REALLY big tools?

I thought that was Joe Biden I saw regrouting the Capital Hill masonry last week . . .

9:57 Palin loves Israel too!  Big hugs for Israel!  I’m waiting for one of them to break into Havah Negillah.

9:55 Biden claims that this administration’s Israel policy has been an abject failure.  Unlike, you know, all those earlier presidents who found simple and effective resolutions to the conflict.

9:32 Oh, she’s back up, with a reference to energy independence.  This is, of course, completely stupid; short of autarky, there’s no way to keep the effects of foreign oil from hitting America’s economy, because our trading partners will continue to use a lot of it.  But it is popular.

9:22 Gwen Ifill asks, as Lehrer did of the presidential candidates, what plans the candidates are prepared to give up on in order to finance the current problem fixes.  Joe Biden’s answer:  we might have to slow down on doubling foreign aid.  Are the American people really prepared for this kind of fiscal sacrifice, Senator?  Oh, also, cutting wasteful spending!  We’re saved!

Megan has snarkiness down to an art form!

Steve

First, I don’t think there were any major gaffes by either candidate and that there was no clear winner.
However, because expectations were so low, a tie is almost certainly a plus for Palin.

Second, Palin did dodge several questions by essentially changing the subject and answering some other, unrelated, question. Although not surprising, I did find it annoying.

Third, the last question by Gwen Ifill asked the question, as best as I can remember, Can you think of a time in your career where you realized that you were wrong and changed your mind or changed your opinion? Biden essentially said yes and Palin essentially said no and used an example of having “caved” when she was setting budget priorities. That answer bothered me because I think an essential element of leadership, which has been glaringly missing the last 8 years, is a willingness to examine yourself, admit wrong, and change course.

I may write another post in the morning after thinking about it.

Scott

This is an amazing post, from Mollie Ziegler at the Get Religion blog,deconstructing the appalling lack of standards on much of the reporting from the mainstream media on Sarah Palin’s religion.

Steve

Remember when the Studio didn’t let Lina Lamont speak in public?
Remember when they finally “freed” Lina Lamont?

I guess my hope is that she’s not humiliated but that the one with the greater gravitas and competence to be the next vice president will be obvious, but it won’t be Sarah Palin.

And if you’ve never seen Singin in the Rain, your culturally impaired.

Scott

Andrew Sullivan wants to know why Megan McCardle is hyperventilating over the bailout but not about:

How about nominating Palin in wartime? I don’t remember Megan panicking about that.

Megan replies:

Andrew may not have heard, but there have been a few interesting developments in the financial markets over the last few weeks.  As an economics blogger, I was regretfully forced to forgo full time devotion to the vice presidential race and turn to more trivial matters.

OUCH! Read the whole thing. Everything she says about the Palin nomination is spot on.

Sullivan’s obsession over Palin really is kind of sad and pitiful.

Steve

I have a place where I put blog ideas and URLs I want to remember, and upon looking through that list I realized I had way more Palin links than I could ever blog on. So here is my dump of my Palin links.

No hurt feelings if you don’t click on even one. But this way I can clean up my BlogIdea list.

Noah Millman on Palin
http://theamericanscene.com/2008/09/17/songs-of-innocence-dirges-of-experience

Newsweek on Palin
http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080

Palin the Mean Girl
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/23/palin/index.html

Witch Hunter
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/witch-hunter-that-prayed-palin-into-office-is-coming-back-to-wasilla/

David Brooks on Why Experience Matters
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=2&ei=5070&emc=eta1&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Bush, Palin and the commitment to Justice
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/09/hbc-90003574

Palin anointed by God
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/09/18/palin_email/index.html

James Fallows on the Palin speech
http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/sarah_palin.php

There is a growing consensus that Sarah Palin has become a big drag on McCain’s campaign, with even a pundit at National Review calling on her to resign. The question is, would that help McCain’s campaign. Nate Silver gives a pretty good answer. Umm, NO.

Money quote:

No matter how well this is spun — Palin withdrew to tend to her family because the liberal media are big meanies! — Palin remains a major reason why conservative activists are showing up every day to make phone calls for John McCain. And to remove her from the ticket now would be a slap in the face.

Scott

Next Page »